Textbook Solutions: Fluid Mechanics, Heat & Mass Transfer, Aerodynamics
This page is being continuously updated with complex (text-book type) problems in Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, Aerodynamics, Mass Transfer, Combustion and Thermodynamics. The solutions to compressible flows including sub-sonic, sonic and supersonic flows inside a converging-diverging nozzle will be presented.
Table of Contents:
Buoyancy \-\ Plug Flow between Parallel Plates \-\ Flow through Pipe Branches forming Tee or Wye Network \-\ Equation of State: Soave-Redlick-Kwong Equation \-\ Half Filled Rotating Tube \+\ Thermal Network Example Calculations \=\ Steps to Create a Thermal Network Solver \=\ TNSolver Examples \=\ Fluid Network Solver \+\ Hardy-Cross Method Example \/\ Example: 3-Reservoirs SystemThis is a very useful case which has frequent engineering applications.


Similarly, for a triangular plate with base horizontal and at depth of Y2 and vertex up at depth of Y1, the centre of pressure is given by:



Even though the complicated definite integration is possible analytically, this is the time the introduce a simple method based on properties of sections. Note that the numerator of expression for centre of pressure is the "Second Moment of Inertia" or simply the Moment of Inertia about a "chosen axis" - typically the free surface of the liquid. The denominator is the "Moment of Area" about the same axis as chosen above - also known as "Statical Moment". Thus:


A metallic block is floating along with a wooden block as shown in the figure below. If this metallic block falls into the tank, calculate the new depth of floatation and height of water level in the tank.




The method of relating two phenomena with some come feature is a powerful tool to both understand and remember the concepts. Following table summarizes key parameters which are analogous in the field of fluid flow (momentum transfer), heat transfer and mass transfer.

The designs of heat exchangers are the most predominant application of conductive heat transfer with such boundary conditions. The temperature profile in walls of a water-cooled internal combustion engine is also subject to this combination of boundary conditions though heat generation is not present in this application. Some applications can be current carrying conductor cooled by convection on both inner and outer diameters, nuclear fission in a annular cross-section cooled by convection on both the inner and outer radii. The governing equation and general solution of the differential equation is given by
Heat flow is assumed positive from left to right. Hence, the convective heat transfer on left face is negative if ambient temperature is < wall temperature on the left face!
Note velocities in pipe branches 1-2, 2-3 and 3-4 are not known in advance and hence the loss coefficients KMN cannot be adjusted to same velocity. Note that the junction losses at node 2 can be incorporated either in K12 or in K23 and K24. It is more convenient to club the node loss in K12 as appropriate assignment into K23 and K24 will involve extra calculations.
This is a non-linear equation in V23 and needs to be solved using trial-and-error or iterative approaches. Microsoft Excel Goal Seek utility can be used to solve this equation as well. A good initial guess would be required.
A more compact approach in terms of fluid resistances can be used as demonstrated below.
Thus, we have 3 equations and 3 unknowns – but they are still non-linear and needs to be solved using iterative method.
A reducing bend having diameters D upstream and d downstream, has water flowing through it at the rate of m [kg/s] under a pressure of p1 bar. Neglecting any loss is head for friction calculate, the horizontal and vertical components of force exerted by the water on the bend.
This is the force acting on the fluid and only means to apply the force on the fluid is the walls of the pipe. Hence, from Newton’s third law, and equation and opposite force will act on the pipe.
ΔΓX = m * [u2X - u1X] = FΓX. Thus: FΓX = m * [u2 cos(θ) - u1]
or gases at very high pressure and those in liquid state such as Liquified Petrolium Gas (LPG), the accuracy of ideal gas equation falls sharply. Many improvizations have been made and SRK equation is one such method. The approach is demonstrated using following sample problem:
A gas cylinder with a volume of 5.0 m3 contains 44 kg of carbon dioxide at T = 273 K. estimate the gas pressure in [atm] using the SRK equation of state. Critical properties of CO2 and Pitzer acentric factor are: Tc = 304.2 K, pc = 72.9 atm, and ω = 0.225.


dp = ρ . {FX dx + FY dy + FZ dz + ω2(xdx + ydy)} where FX is the force per unit volume is X-direction. Alternatively, dp = ρ . {FX dx + FY dy + FZ dz + ω2rdr}. Any point where liquid separates is the location where pressure vanishes i.e. p = 0. Latus rectum of free surface = 2g/ω2.

Half Filled Rotating Tube: A circular tube is half full of liquid and is made to revolve around a vertical tangent line with angular velocity ω. If radius of the tube is R, calculate the angle between horizontal and diameter passing through the free surface of the liquid.

The tube is rotating about red line and the liquid level is shown by yellow zone. Point 'D' is the lower most point of free surface, θ is the angle which needs to be calculated.
The pressure at any location is given by: dp = ρ (ω2r.dr + gdz) where r is the distance of the point from the axis of rotation and z is the distance of the point from the origin. The point 'D' is rotating at radius r = R(1-cosθ), z = R.sinθ and is at p = 0. Another known point 'C' is at pressure zero, r = R(1+cosθ), z = -Rsinθ. Note that +z is along the downward direction (this is only a convention).


Liquid filled in rotating conical pot: A conical pot of height H and vertical (full cone) angle θ contains liquid k-times (x < 1) the volume of full cone. Find out the minimum angular velocity at which shall prevent liquid overflowing the cone.

Thus; z = (1-k).2H/3 ... [1] Also, from paraboloid of revolution (latus rectum): 2g/ω2 = R2/z ⇒ z = ω2.R2/2/g ... [2]
To prevent overflow: z ≤ (1-k).2H/3From equations [1] and [2], ω2.R2/2/g ≤ (1-k).2H/3 ⇒ ω ≤ [4g/3.(1-k).H/R2]1/2
R = H . tan(α) ⇒ ω ≤ [4g/3H.(1-k)]1/2.cot(α), thus if k = 0.5, ω ≤ [2g/3H]1/2.cot(α)



For a container rotating cylindrical about its axis: the shape of the free surface is a parabola and fluid inside the rotating cylinder forms a paraboloid of revolution, whose volume is one-half of the volume of the "circumscribing cylinder". To calculate angular velocity at which the liquid at the center reaches the bottom of the cylinder just as the liquid at the curved wall reaches the top of the cylinder: ωspill = (2gH)0.5/R.
Ball in rotating tube

The centroid of a hemi-sphere is at 3R/8 from the base. Using this value, pressure on the left half of the ball = 1/2.ρF ω2(r-3R/8)2. The pressure on the right half of the ball = 1/2.ρF ω2(r+3R/8)2. Net force acting on the ball towards the axis of rotation = 1/2.ρF ω2(4.r.3R/8)2 × π*R2 where projected area = π*R2.
Net force due to fluid pressure towards axis of rotation, FF = 1/2.πR2.ρF ω2(r.3R/2) = 3/4πR3.ρF ω2r
Centrifugal force due to own mass of the ball, FB = 4/3.πR3.ρB ω2r
The position of the ball can be estimated using inequality FB ≤ FF. Will the ball get pushed towards inner radius for all densities of the ball? This method yeilded incorrect conclusion as the pressure on the surface of spherical ball was assumed to be varying linearly with radius instead of parabolic variation as per formula p(r) = p(r = r0) + 1/2.ρFω2r2. The correct derivation of net fluid forces acting on the ball are given below:
A circular cylinder of radius 'a' whose axis is vertical, is filled to depth h with homogeneous liquid of density ρ. Find the pressure as function of radial and vertical positions. Also, find the forces acting on the top lid if closed.

dp = ρ{-g.dz + ω2rdr} -> p = ρ{-g.z + 1/2.ω2r2} + C
Applying boundary condition at centre of top surface, p = 0 at r = 0 and z = h, C = ρgh. Thus, p = ρ{-g.z + 1/2.ω2r2} + ρgh and pressure at any point on top lid can be found by z = h. The thrust on the top lid is:
A hollow cone nearly filled with water, rotates uniformly about its axis which is vertical, the vertex being uppermost. Find the total thrust on the base of the cone. 'a' is the radius of the base and 2α the vertical angle of the cone.

p = ρ{-g.z + 1/2.ω2r2} + ρgh
At the base of the cone, z = 0. Thus, p(z=0) = ρ{1/2.ω2r2} + ρgh
Practice Questions:
Step-0: Define problem set-up: Steady or Transient, Initial Temperature, Total Run Time, Time Step Solution, Time Step Data Save.
Step-1: Define input table for the network. For Steady state cases, Cp and Mass shall be neglected.

Note that: NND = number of nodes, NCV = Number of control volumes = NND+1, XND[0] = XCV[0] = 0, XCV[i] = (XND[i+1] + XND[i] ) / 2 for i = 1 to NND-1, XCV[NCV] = XND[NND]. LCV[0] = XND[1]/2, LCV[i] = XCV[i] - XCV[i-1], LCV[NCV] = 0.5 x (XND[NND] - XND[NND-1])
| Node | T | ARX | Cp | Mass | Connected Nodes | ||
| [No.] | [C] | [m2] | [J/kg-K] | [kg] | [No.] | ||
| 1 | 0 | 0.01 | 2700 | 0.10 | 2 | 3 | - |
| 2 | 0 | 0.01 | 1200 | 0.05 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 3 | 40 | 0.01 | 1200 | 0.02 | 1 | 5 | 2 |
| 4 | 0 | 0.01 | 500 | 0.01 | 3 | - | - |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
Step-2: Define resistance table. All information can be supplied as CSV file in following order (use negative number for boundary nodes). Here, Tref can be used to specified reference temperature for nodes with HTC boundary conditions as well as nodes with known or fixed temperatures. Value of 0 for Temperature or Tref indicate unknown or optional. There are some limitations to define the nodes such as a node must be placed where there is step change of cross-section. The node numbering must start with 1 and increase sequentially without any gap.
[3] [6]
| |
| |
[1]--------[2]------[5]-------[8]-------[9]-------[10]
| |
| |
[4] [7]
R_ID, s_node, e_node, xLen, xAr, k, Cp, Den
R01, 1, 2, 0.050, 0.0005, 200.0, 500.0, 2700.0
R02, 2, 3, 0.025, 0.0005, 200.0, 500.0, 2700.0
R03, 2, 4, 0.025, 0.0005, 200.0, 500.0, 2700.0
R04, 2, 5, 0.125, 0.0005, 200.0, 500.0, 2700.0
R05, 5, 6, 0.025, 0.0005, 200.0, 500.0, 2700.0
R06, 5, 7, 0.025, 0.0005, 200.0, 500.0, 2700.0
R07, 5, 8, 0.025, 0.0005, 200.0, 500.0, 2700.0
R08, 8, 9, 0.025, 0.0005, 200.0, 500.0, 2700.0
R09, 9, 10, 0.025, 0.0005, 200.0, 500.0, 2700.0
Use one line function to calculation thermal resistance and thermal inertia (capacitance) - lambda functions can also be used.
def calcThermalRes(xL, xA, xk): return xL/xA/xk def calcThermalIntertia(xL, xA, xDen, xCp): return xDen * (xL * xA) * xCpInputs for nodes, note that symbol Tref is used both for specified node temperature and reference temperature in case of convective boundary conditions.
NN stands for Node Number ------------------------- NN, Qdot, HTC, Tref 1, 0, 0, 288 2, 50, 0, 0 3, 50, 0, 0 4, 50, 0, 0 5, 0, 0, 0 6, 0, 0, 323 7, 0, 10, 298 8, 0, 10, 298 9, 0, 0, 0 10, 0, 0, 373
import csv
def csvToColumnLists(csv_file):
'''
Reads a CSV file and returns a dictionary where keys are column headers
and values are lists containing the data for each column. First non empty
row is assumed to be header containing strings without spaces. Header names
are case-sensitive.
'''
column_data = {}
with open(csv_file, 'r', newline='') as file_csv:
reader = csv.reader(file_csv)
headers = next(reader)
headers = [header.strip() for header in headers]
# Initialize empty list for each header and append data
for header in headers:
column_data[header] = []
for row in reader:
for i, value in enumerate(row):
column_data[headers[i]].append(value.strip())
return column_data
#
data_r = csvToColumnLists('thermal_r.csv')
node_col_1 = data_r['s_node']
node_col_2 = data_r['e_node']
node_col_1 = [int(NN) for NN in node_col_1]
node_col_2 = [int(NN) for NN in node_col_2]
xL = data_r['xLen']
# Find names of nodes as union of sets from column 2 and 3
NNU = list(set(node_col_1) | (set(node_col_2)))
NNU = [int(N) for N in NNU]
NNU.sort()
NNL = node_col_1 + node_col_2
max_n = int(max(set(NNL), key=NNL.count))
NNR = len(data_r['R_ID'])
NMAT = [[0] * max_n] * NNR
Create thermal resistance 2D array
def createRTH(xLen, xAr, xk, node_i, node_j):
'''
Create thermal resistance as 2D matrix, the size of matrix is 1 greater than
the maximum node number in the network. Note that node numbering starts from
1 and increase sequentially without any gap or step.
'''
NTH = int(max(max(node_i), max(node_j)))
NR = len(node_i)
RTH = []
for _ in range(NTH):
row = [0] * NTH
RTH.append(row)
for i in range(0, NR):
m = int(node_i[i]) - 1
n = int(node_j[i]) - 1
RTH[m][n] = float(xLen[i]) / float(xAr[i]) / float(xk[i])
RTH[n][m] = RTH[m][n]
return RTH
Step-3: Define governing equations using energy balance at each nodes with unknown temperatures and nodes with known temperatures.
For node-1 above: (T1 - T2)/R12 + (T1 - T3)/R13 = Qdot1
or
A1 T1 + B12T2 + B13T3 = Qdot1 where the second values in the subscripts correspond to entry under "Connected Nodes".
For node-2 above: (T2 - T1)/R12 + (T2 - T3)/R23 + (T2 - T4)/R24 = Qdot2
or
A2 T2 + B21T1 + B23T3 + B24T4 = Qdot2 where the second values in the subscripts correpond to entry under "Connected Nodes".
Step-4: Convert the individual equations into equivalent index notation (subscripts converted into indices of arrays).
Step-5: Define variables and arrays. NND = number of nodes, 1D arrays: XND[NND], XCV[NCV] Qdot[NND], Cp[NND], mass[NND], cond[NND], XAR[NND], LCV[NND]. 2D arrays: coeff_a[NND, NND], coeff_b[NND, NND], coeff_c[NND, NND], th_res[NND, 10], con_nodes(NND, 10). Each node is assumed to be connected to maximum 10 nodes.
Write functions to approximate differential equations



For steady state 1D heat conduction with volumetric heat generation and convective heat loss:

Another example from web:

Training Project: Development of thermal network model and validation of results with 3D CFD simulations using ANSYS Fluent or OpenFOAM is a good internship project. This will impart not only programming skills but also help the engineer gain insight into heat transfer and matrix algebra.
Thermal Network Example Hand Calculations
Assume all heat flowing into a node is positive and all nodes around it are at higher temperatures. Final result will amend this assumption to correct values.q'[100W]----->[1]-------[2]--------[3]== T [300 K]
L: 0.10 [m]
A: 5E-4 [m2]
k: 50.0 [W/m-K]
Thermal Resistance: R12 = R23 = k/L/A = 4.0 [K/W]
Node-1: 1/R12 * [T2 - T1] = q' Node-2: 1/R12 * [T2 - T1] + 1/R23 * [T2 - T3] = 0 -1/R12 * [T1] + [1/R12 + 1/R23] * [T2] = T3/R23 -1/R12 * [T1] + [1/R12 + 1/R23] * [T2] = T3/R23
Matrix to solve
-1/R12 * [T1] + 1/R12 * [T2] = q' -1/R12 * [T1] + [1/R12 + 1/R23] * [T2] = T3/R23
Some other configurations that can serve as validation for any thermal network solver are:
q'[100 W]----->[1]-------[2]--------[3]== T [300 K]
|
|
[4]
q' [50 W]
HTC: 20 [W/m2-K], TREF=300 [K]
[5]
|
|
q'[100 W]----->[1]-------[2]--------[3]== T [300 K]
|
|
[4]
q' [50 W]
Generic node in a thermal network:
[s] [r] [p]
.' \ | /
' \ | /
' *[n]'-------- [m]
' |
` , |
` - =[u]
Assuming heat 'q' [W] is generated at node 'n' and all surrounding nodes are at lower temperatures:
[Tn - Tm]/RTH[n,m] + [Tn - Tp]/RTH[n,p] + ... + [Tn - Tu]/RTH[n,u] + h.A.[Tn - Tref] = q
{1/RTH[n,m] + 1/RTH[n,p] + ... + 1/RTH[n,u] + h.A}*Tn - 1/RTH[n,m]*Tm - ... - 1/RTH[n,u]*Tu = q + h.A.TrefΣj(1/RTH[n, j]) . Tn - {Σj[1/RTH[n,j] . Tj} = q + h.A.Tref ... ... ...[1]
In terms of thermal conductances:Σj(CTH[n, j]) . Tn - {Σj[CTH[n,j] . Tj} = q + h.A.Tref ... ... ...[2]
Next step: create thermal resistance 2d array. RTH[j,k] are calculated earlier and known for all j and k - sparse symmetric matrix, RTH[j, k] = RTH[k, j] and diagonal entries = 0. Note that thermal resistances by definition are always positive, a negative value is used to indicate direction of heat transfer.
Thermal Resistance Array:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
--------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|
1 0 | 0.50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 0.50 | 0 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 1.25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5 0 | 1.25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0 | 0 |
6 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 |
9 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 | 0.25 |
10 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.25 | 0 |
The thermal conductance matrix is:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
--------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|
1 0 | 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 2.0 | 0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 0 | 4.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 0 | 4.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5 0 | 0.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0 | 0 |
6 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 | 0 |
9 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 | 0 | 4.0 |
10 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.0 | 0 |
Next step: find out nodes with known temperature.
data_n = csvToColumnLists('thermal_n.csv')
node_nnum = data_n['NN']
node_nnum = [int(NN) for NN in node_nnum]
node_hgen = data_n['Qdot']
node_hgen = [float(x) for x in node_hgen]
node_htc = data_n['HTC']
node_htc = [float(x) for x in node_htc]
node_Tref = data_n['Tref']
node_Tref = [float(x) for x in node_Tref]
node_known_T = [
item_1 for item_1, item_2, item_3 in zip(node_nnum, node_htc, node_Tref)
if item_2 == 0 and item_3 != 0
]
Next step: create node connectivity matrix. The matrix of each node and connected nodes (the indices for summation over index i in equation above) except for those with known/specified temperatures, can be estimated as follows.
Node connectivity array:
2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
7 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
8 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
9 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
[3] [6]
| |
| |
[1]--------[2]------[5]-------[8]-------[9]-------[10]
| |
| |
[4] [7]
Using Σj(CTH[n, j]) . Tn - {Σj[CTH[n,j] . Tj} = q + h.A.Tref ... ... ...[2]
Node-2: Generic internal Node connected with more than 1 node.
(C[2, 1] + C[2, 3] + C[2, 4] + C[2, 5]) * T[2]
- C[2, 3] * T[3]
- C[2, 4] * T[4]
- C[2, 5] * T[5]
= C[2, 1] * T[1] + q[2] + h[2] * A[2] * (T[2] - Tref[2])
A[0, 1]*T[2] + A[0, 2]*T[3] + A[0, 3]*T[4] + A[0, 4]*T[5] = B[1]
Node-3: Boundary Internal Node connected with 1 node but also to a virtual node due to HTC boundary conditions.
C[3, 2] * (T[3] - T[2]) = q[3] + h[3] * A[3] * (T[3] - Tref[3]) A[1, 0]*T[2] + A[1, 2]*T[3] = B[2]
Node-4: convection node
C[4, 2] * (T[4] - T[2]) = q[4] + h[4] * A[4] * (T[4] - Tref[4]) A[2, 0]*T[2] + A[2, 3]*T[4] = B[3]Node-5:
(C[5, 2] + C[5, 6] + C[5, 7] + C[5, 8]) * T[5]
- C[2, 5] * T[2]
- C[7, 5] * T[7]
- C[8, 5] * T[8]
= C[7, 5] * T[7] + q[5] + h[5] * A[5] * (T[5] - Tref[5])
A[3, 0]*T[2] + + A[3, 4]*T[5] + A[3, 6]*T[7] + A[3, 7]*T[8] = B[4]
Next step: generate coefficient matrix as per equation [1] above. Compute the number of nodes with unknown temperature from node connectivity matrix. The coefficient matrix A[i, j] would be of size N x N where N is number of rows in node connectivity array defined above. phi_T = [row[0] for row in node_con_array] to get first column which contains node numbers for which temperature needs to be calculated.
Note:
Get first column of each row as center node: row_i = node_con_mat[i]; n_num = row_i[0]
Inner Loop Loops over second item onwards on each row
Calculate diagonal item of coefficient matrix A[i, i]
The initial coefficient matrix is as follows. Note that the rows and columns corresponding to nodes with specified temperature are all not required for final matrix inversion (solution of temperature values). Also, the coefficient matrix need not be symmetric.10.8 | -4.0 | -4.0 | -0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -4.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -4.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 12.8 | -4.0 | -4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -4.0 | 3.995 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -4.0 | 0.0 | 7.995 | -4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -4.0 | 8.0 |
Computed value of {b} excluding for those with known T:
{b} = [626.0, 50.0, 50.0, 1292.0, 1.49, 1.49, 1492.0]Computed temperatures in [K]: for nodes in first column of node connectivity matrix above. Validation of result with hand calculation is in progress though values are very close to results produced by TNSolver (without HTC boundary conditions).
288.0 356.2 368.7 368.7 339.1 323.0 339.9 350.9 362.0 373.0The results match with TNSolver values when convection is removed from nodes. Further enhancements planned for this code are:
The code can also be used to solve electrical networks where thermal conductivity 'k' needs to be replaced by electrical conductivity 'σ'. RTH = L/k/A, REL = ρ.L/A = L/σ/A where electrical conductivity σ = 1/ρ, ρ = electrical resistivity.
The example demonstrated above is linear and explicit where all coefficients and constants are independent of field variable 'T'. In cases where thermal conductivity is function of temperature or heat generation rate is function of temperature or cases like radiation where heat transfer rate is not a linear function of temperature [\(Q=\epsilon A\sigma (T^{4}-T_{∞}^{4})\)], the simple matrix inversion methods like y = np.linalg.solve(A, b) does not work. \[h_{rad}=\frac{\epsilon \sigma (T_{i}^{4}-T_{∞}^{4})}{(T_{i}-T_{∞})}\] which can be simplified (still non-linear) to \(h_{rad}=\epsilon \sigma (T_{i}+T_{∞})(T_{i}^{2}+T_{∞}^{2})\) The method above assumes that the ambient behaves like a black body. In case of radiative heat exchange between two non-black (grey) bodies and reflections of radiation are not taken into account: \[Q_{ij}^{RAD} = ε_i ε_j\cdot A_i F_{ij} (T_{i}^{4}-T_{j}^{4})\] When reflection of radiations are taken into account, some of the radiation coming from surface i gets reflected by surface j. A part of this reflected energy shall end up on other surfaces, which in their turn (if grey) shall reflect some fraction of the incident radiation. Radiative heat exchange between grey bodies is calculated using two different methods: Gebhart method and the Oppenheim method (Net Radiant Method).An iterative method like Jacobi or Gauss-Seidel iteration is required. The coefficient matrix A should ideally be diagonally dominant for guaranteed convergence. In Jacobi iteration, the value of each \(x_{i}\) at the new iteration is computed using the formula:
$$x_{i}^{(k+1)}=\frac{b_{i}-\sum \limits _{j\ne i}a_{ij}x_{j}^{(k)}}{a_{ii}}$$def Jacobi(A, b, x_0, max_iter=100, tolerance=1.0e-6):
'''
x_0: Initial guess for the solution, numpy array
tolerance: Convergence criteria
max_iter: Maximum number of iterations to perform
Returns: the approximate solution [vector].
'''
# Initialize the solution vector
x = x_0.copy()
n = len(b)
for k in range(max_iter):
x_new = x.copy()
for i in range(n):
# Calculate the sum of row elements, excluding diagonal value
sum_row = 0
for j in range(n):
if i != j:
sum_row = sum_row + A[i, j] * x[j]
x_new[i] = (b[i] - sum_row) / A[i, i]
# Check for convergence, np.inf = Maximum absolute value
L2NORM_new = np.linalg.norm(x_new - x, ord=np.inf)
L2NORM_old = np.linalg.norm(x_new, ord=np.inf)
if (L2NORM_new / L2NORM_old) <= tolerance:
print(f"Solution converged after {k+1} iterations.")
return x_new
x = x_new
print(f"Converge could not be achieved within {max_iter} iterations.")
return x
Gauss-Seidel Method: The convergence is guaranteed if the matrix A is strictly diagonally dominant [magnitude of diagonal entry ≥ sum of the magnitudes of non-diagonal entries for each row] or symmetric positive definite [square matrix that is equal to its transpose]. The Gauss-Seidel method often converges faster than the Jacobi method by using updated values within the same iteration.
def GaussSeidel(A, b, x_0, max_iter=100, tolerance=1.0e-6, ):
A = np.array(A, dtype=float)
b = np.array(b, dtype=float)
x = np.array(x_0, dtype=float)
n = len(b)
for iter in range(max_iter):
x_old = np.copy(x)
for i in range(n):
sum_ax = np.dot(A[i, :i], x[:i]) + np.dot(A[i, i+1:], x_old[i+1:])
x[i] = (b[i] - sum_ax) / A[i, i]
if np.linalg.norm(x - x_old) < tolerance:
print(f"Convergence achieved after {iter + 1} iterations.")
return x
print(f"Run did not converge within {max_iter} iterations.")
return x
Finally, the most generic equation for thermal network solvers is derived below. Here, index 'i' is the node under iteration and 'j' refers nodes connected to it as described in node connectivity array.
\(\sum\limits_{j}\left[C_{ij} * (T_i - T_j)\right] + F_{ij} \cdot ε \cdot σ \cdot \sum\limits_{j}\left[\frac{A_{ij}}{2}) \cdot (T_{i}^4 - T_{REF}^4) \right] + \sum\limits_{j}\left[h \cdot \frac{A_{ij}}{2} * (T_i - T_j)\right] = \dot{q}_i \)
\(\sum\limits_{j}\left[ C_{ij} * (T_i - T_j)\right] + F_{ij} \cdot ε \cdot σ \cdot \sum\limits_{j}\left[\frac{A_{ij}}{2} \cdot (T_{i}^2 - T_{REF}^2) \cdot ((T_{i}^2 + T_{REF}^2)\right] + \sum\limits_{j}\left[h \cdot \frac{A_{ij}}{2} * (T_i - T_j)\right] = \dot{q}_i \)
\(\sum\limits_{j}\left[ C_{ij} * (T_i - T_j)\right] + F_{ij} \cdot ε \cdot σ \cdot \sum\limits_{j}\left[\frac{A_{ij}}{2} \cdot (T_{i} - T_{REF}) \cdot (T_{i} + T_{REF}) \cdot (T_{i}^2 + T_{REF}^2) \right] + \sum\limits_{j}\left[h \cdot \frac{A_{ij}}{2} * (T_i - T_j)\right] = \dot{q}_i\)
\( C_{RAD} = \underbrace{ (T_{REF}^2 + T_{i}^2) \cdot (T_i + T_{REF})}_\text{Non-linearity}\)\(\sum\limits_{j}\left[C_{ij} + F_{ij} ε \cdotσ \cdot\frac{A_{ij}}{2}\cdot C_{RAD} + h \cdot \frac{A_{ij}}{2} \right ]\cdot T_i - \sum\limits_{j}\left (C_{ij} + h \cdot \frac{A{ij}}{2}) \right) \cdot T_j = \dot{q}_i + \sum\limits_{j}F_{ij} \cdot ε \cdot σ\cdot \frac{A_{ij}}{2} \left[T_{REF}\cdot C_{RAD} \right]\)
For 'i' defined in first column of node connectivity array above and 'j' varying from second column onwards for each 'i':\(K_{ii}\cdot T_i - \sum\limits_{j}K_{ij}\cdot T_j = b_i \)
where \[K_{ii} = \sum\limits_{j}\left[C_{ij} + F_{ij} ε \cdotσ \cdot\frac{A_{ij}}{2}\cdot C_{RAD} + h \cdot \frac{A_{ij}}{2} \right ]\] \[ K_{ij} = - \left (C_{ij} + h \cdot\frac{A{ij}}{2} \right) \]
Sample thermal network for a battery pack
[CON1+] [CON1-] [CON2+] [CON2-]
| | | |
|__[Case-top]__| |___[Case-top]__| ...other cells
| |
| |
[Cell-Z] [Cell-Z]
| |
| |
[Case]--[Gap-1]--[Can-1]--[C-1]--[Can-1]--[Gap-2]--[Can-2]--[C-2]--[Gap-3] ...other cells
| |
| |
[Cell-Z] [Cell-Z]
| |
| |
[Case-Bot] [Case-Bot] ...other cells
TNSolver Examples
Most of the examples in public domain are available through work published by Bob Cochran at Applied Computational Heat Transfer, Seattle, WA (TNSolver@heattransfer.org). Not much could be found in other sources. From user guide: plane wall with fixed temperature and convection boundary conditions.|```````| [in] [out]---[Tinf] h = 2.3 [W/m2-K] | | ``````` Begin Solution Parameters title = Simple Wall Model type = steady units = SI T units = C !Default is 'C', other options K, F, R End Solution Parameters Begin Conductors ! label type nd_i nd_j parameters wall conduction in out 2.3 1.2 1.0 ! k L A fluid convection out Tinf 2.3 1.0 ! h A End Conductors Begin Boundary Conditions ! type parameter node(s) fixed_T 21.0 in ! Inner wall T fixed_T 5.0 Tinf ! Fluid T End Boundary ConditionsDetailed output is in *.out file. The *.rst file contains:
time = 0
in 21
out 12.2727
Tinf 5
*.csv files contain
"label", "type", "nd_i", "nd_j", "T_i (C)", "T_j (C)", "Q (W)", "U (W/m^2-K)", "A (m^2)" "wall", "conduction", "in", "out", 21, 12.2727, 16.7273, 1.91667, 1 "fluid", "convection", "out", "Tinf", 12.2727, 5, 16.7273, 2.3, 1and
"label", "material", "volume (m^3)", "temperature (C)" "in", "N/A", 0, 21 "out", "N/A", 0, 12.2727 "Tinf", "N/A", 0, 5
Solution of the sample case described above (and used for Python scripting), in TNSolver without convection at nodes: note that TNSolver has option of specified temperature, heat flux, heat source and volumetric heat source at nodes. Convection can be specified on resistors only. Thus, tip convection can be applied using additional node to represent T∞ or the reference temperature for HTC.
Begin Solution Parameters
title = Simple Wall Model
type = steady
units = SI
T units = K !Default is 'C', other options K, F, R
End Solution Parameters
Begin Conductors
! label type nd_i nd_j parameters
R01 conduction N_01 N_02 200 0.050 0.0005 ! k L A
R02 conduction N_02 N_03 200 0.025 0.0005 ! k L A
R03 conduction N_02 N_04 200 0.025 0.0005 ! k L A
R04 conduction N_02 N_05 200 0.125 0.0005 ! k L A
R05 conduction N_05 N_06 200 0.025 0.0005 ! k L A
R06 conduction N_05 N_07 200 0.025 0.0005 ! k L A
R07 conduction N_05 N_08 200 0.025 0.0005 ! k L A
R08 conduction N_08 N_09 200 0.025 0.0005 ! k L A
R09 conduction N_09 N_10 200 0.025 0.0005 ! k L A
End Conductors
Begin Boundary Conditions
! type parameter node(s)
fixed_T 288 N_01
fixed_T 323 N_06
fixed_T 373 N_10
End Boundary Conditions
Begin Sources
! type parameter(s) node(s)
Qsrc 50.0 N_02
Qsrc 50.0 N_03
Qsrc 50.0 N_04
End Sources
Calculated temperature values in [K] are:
time = 0 N_01 288.0 N_02 355.9 N_03 368.4 N_04 368.4 N_05 338.2 N_06 323.0 N_07 338.2 N_08 349.8 N_09 361.4 N_10 373.0The result using Python code developed above and without heat transfer coefficient boundary at any node is given below. The values match with TNSolver and also demonstrates the fact that the effect of heat loss through convection at tip is negligible.
[288.0 355.9 368.4 368.4 338.2 323.0 338.2 349.8 361.4 373.0]
Example taken from "TNSolver: An Open Source Thermal Network Solver for Octave or MATLAB" by Bob Cochran at Thermal & Fluids Analysis Workshop (TFAWS) 2016

Begin Solution Parameters
title = Radiation Heat Transfer Experiment - Black Target
type = steady
nonlinear convergence = 1.0e-8
maximum nonlinear iterations = 50
End Solution Parameters
Begin Conductors
! Conduction through the beaker wall, 0.1" thick pyrex glass
t-bbin conduction targ bbin 0.14 0.00254 0.024829 ! k L A
! Convection from beaker to water
! label type nd_i nd_j mat L A
t-w ENChplateup bbin water water 0.04445 0.02483
! Convection from target to air
! label type nd_i nd_j mat L A
t-air ENChplatedown targ env air 0.0889 0.0248
! Convection from outer shield to air
! label type nd_i nd_j mat H L theta A
s-air ENCiplateup s_out env air 0.0508 0.0508 48.0 0.056439
! Conduction from inner to outer side of shield
shield conduction s_in s_out steel 0.001 0.056439
End Conductors
Begin Radiation Enclosure
! surf emiss A Fij
htr 0.92 0.06701 0.0 0.1264 0.68415 0.0 0.1893
targ 0.95 0.02482 0.34132 0.0 0.00603 0.1031 0.5494
s_in 0.28 0.05643 0.81231 0.00265 0.12278 0.0 0.0622
s_out 0.28 0.05643 0.0 0.0453 0.0 0.0 0.9546
env 1.00 0.11840 0.10711 0.1151 0.02965 0.4547 0.2933
End Radiation Enclosure
Begin Boundary Conditions
! type Tb Node(s)
fixed_T 23.0 env
fixed_T 88.3 water
fixed_T 515.0 htr
End Boundary Conditions
Output from *.rst file:
time = 0 bbin 93.4466 env 23 htr 515 s_in 272.032 s_out 271.956 targ 175.252 water 88.3
Fin with force convection and thermal radiation
[Tc]
|
.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,*,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. [Tc]
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
[base]-----[1]-----[2]-----[3]-----[4]-----[5]-----[6]-----[tip]
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
```````````````````|``````````````````` [Tr]
[Tr]
! Fin Experiment Model - Aluminum fin - Forced convection
Begin Solution Parameters
title = Aluminum Fin - Forced Convection
type = steady
nonlinear convergence = 1.0e-8
maximum nonlinear iterations = 15
End Solution Parameters
Begin Conductors
! label type nd_i nd_j k L A
100 conduction base 1 167.0 0.030 0.000127
101 conduction 1 2 167.0 0.025 0.000127
102 conduction 2 3 167.0 0.045 0.000127
103 conduction 3 4 167.0 0.070 0.000127
104 conduction 4 5 167.0 0.050 0.000127
105 conduction 5 6 167.0 0.063 0.000127
106 conduction 6 tip 167.0 0.002 0.000127
! label type nd_i nd_j mat Vel D A
121 EFCcyl 1 Tc air 3.7 0.0127 0.00170
122 EFCcyl 2 Tc air 3.7 0.0127 0.00140
123 EFCcyl 3 Tc air 3.7 0.0127 0.00229
124 EFCcyl 4 Tc air 3.7 0.0127 0.00239
125 EFCcyl 5 Tc air 3.7 0.0127 0.00225
126 EFCcyl 6 Tc air 3.7 0.0127 0.00134
127 EFCcyl tip Tc air 3.7 0.0127 0.00013
! label type nd_i nd_j emissivity A
221 surfrad 1 Tr 0.09 0.001696
222 surfrad 2 Tr 0.09 0.001396
223 surfrad 3 Tr 0.09 0.002294
224 surfrad 4 Tr 0.09 0.002394
225 surfrad 5 Tr 0.09 0.002254
226 surfrad 6 Tr 0.09 0.001337
227 surfrad tip Tr 0.09 0.000127
End Conductors
Begin Boundary Conditions
! type Tb Node(s)
fixed_T 25.0 Tc
fixed_T 25.0 Tr
fixed_T 55.8 base
End Boundary Conditions
Example of Composite Walls
.---------,----------------------,-----------,
| | | |
| | kB | |
| | | |
[TIN] kA [1]--------------------[2] kD [TOUT]
| | | |
| | kC | |
|_________|______________________|___________|
Option-1 of thermal network
|````````|
| |
[TIN]-------[1] [2]------[TOUT]
| |
| |
````````
! label type node-1 node-2 parameters (k, L, A)
100 conduction Tin 1 1.0 1.0 2.0
101 conduction 1 2 2.0 3.0 1.0
102 conduction 1 2 2.0 3.0 1.0
103 conduction 2 Tout 1.0 1.0 2.0
Option-2: Two parallel paths
|`````````[1]``````[2]````````|
| |
[TIN] [TOUT]
| |
| |
`````````[3]``````[4]````````
! label type node-1 node-2 parameters (k, L, A)
100 conduction Tin 1 1.0 1.0 1.0
101 conduction 1 2 2.0 3.0 1.0
102 conduction 2 Tout 1.0 1.0 1.0
103 conduction Tin 3 1.0 1.0 1.0
104 conduction 3 4 2.0 3.0 1.0
105 conduction 4 Tout 1.0 1.0 1.0
Fluid Network Solver
Many of the concept used in thermal network solver can also be used in fluid network solver (without heat transfer). For incompressible flows (constant density), from continuity for node 'i' and connected nodes designated as 'j': \[\sum\limits_{j}Q_{ij} = 0 \]Major difference is in the basic definitions though: ΔT = Q. RTH and ΔP = Q2 * RHD
If a flow network contains NN junctions (or nodes) then NN-1 independent continuity equations in the form given above can be written. A flow resistance network consisting of NN nodes (junctions) and NL non-overlapping loops formed by NP resistances, will satisfy the equation NP = (NN - 1) · NL. From energy equations in terms of head losses and NL number of independent loops, for loop 'i': \[\sum \limits_{j}\Delta h_{j}^i = 0 \] The head loss for a flow resistance is typically given as Δh = ξ·Qn (n = 2 for most cases): \[\sum \limits_{j}\xi_j \cdot Q_{j}^n = 0 \] Solving for the NP unknown volumetric flow rates in the NP flow resistances (pipes) of a network, as many number of equations must be derived. Most widely used method for solving fluid flow networks is the Hardy Cross method which is an adaptation of the Newton-Raphson method which solves one equation at a time before proceeding to the next equation during each iteration instead of solving all equations simultaneously. The steps used in Hardy-Cross method are as follows:
[4]```````[5]``````[6]
| |
[1]-----[2]-----[3] [7]
| |
[8]-------[9]------[10]
|
[12]------[11]-----[13]
| |
[17]-----------[14] |
| |
[15]----------------[16]
And the input file can be of the following format where (like in thermal network solver) of '0' implies unknown (to be calculated). Note that NP = (NN - 1) · NL does not hold true here. For initial version of the solver, all nodes are assumed to be at same height.
[FLOW RESISTORS BEGIN] R_ID, s_node, e_node, delta_p, flow_rate, loss_coeff, Aref R01, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0.02, 0.001 R02, 2, 3, 0, 0, 0.02, 0.001 R03, 3, 4, 0, 0, 0.02, 0.001 R04, 4, 5, 0, 0, 0.02, 0.001 R05, 5, 6, 0, 0, 0.02, 0.001 R06, 6, 7, 0, 0, 0.02, 0.001 R07, 7, 10, 0, 0, 0.02, 0.001 R08, 9, 10, 0, 0, 0.02, 0.001 R09, 8, 9, 0, 0, 0.02, 0.001 R10, 8, 3, 0, 0, 0.02, 0.001 R11, 9, 11, 20, 0, 0.02, 0.001 R12, 11, 12, 0, 0, 0.02, 0.001 R13, 11, 13, 0, 0.01, 0.02, 0.001 R14, 12, 14, 0, 0, 0.02, 0.001 R15, 14, 15, 0, 0, 0.02, 0.001 R16, 13, 16, 0, 0, 0.02, 0.001 R17, 15, 16, 0, 0, 0.02, 0.001 R18, 14, 17, 0, 0, 0.02, 0.001 [FLOW RESISTORS END]The nodes (junctions) of specified pressure and losses at junctions such as merging branches can be specified in following section.
[FLOW NODES BEGIN] NNUM, pressure, pressure_loss 1, 250, 0 17, 0, 0 [FLOW NODES END]
[m] [n]
| |
| |
Qi---> [i]---------[j] <---Qj
/ \
/ \
[u] [v]
\( Q_i = R_{ij} \cdot (P_i - P_j)^n \text{ if } P_i > P_j\) where n = 1/2 for most of hydraulic elements. \( Q_j = R_{ij} \cdot (P_j - P_i)^n \text{ if } P_j > P_i\). In other words: \( Q_i = R_{ij} \cdot |P_i - P_j|^{n-1} \cdot (P_i - P_j)\) and \( Q_j = R_{ij} \cdot |P_j - P_i|^{n-1} \cdot (P_j - P_i)\). In matrix notation,
\[ \begin{bmatrix} Q_i \\ Q_j \end{bmatrix} = R'\begin{bmatrix} +1 \; \; -1 \\ -1 \; \; +1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} P_i \\ P_j \end{bmatrix}
\]
Applying continuity at any interior node i (without mass generation or accumulation at any node, though mass can come in or go out from boundary nodes), a linear system of equation [R]{P'} = {Q*} can be created where vector {P'} is corrected pressure and vector {Q} is the estimated flow rates. This is an alternate formulation of element-by-element solution method which does not require formation of the full coefficient matrix. Conjugate Gradient method of solution can be used to iteratively solve the
linearised equations.
Instead of tracking sign of flow rates (direction), it is easier to use following formulation:
\[Q_{ij} = \frac{P_i - P_j}{|P_i - P_j|} \cdot \sqrt \frac{|P_i - P_j|}{R_{ij}}\] This can be conveniently implements in Python as: Q[i][j] = np.sign(P[i] - P[j]) * math.sqrt(abs(P[i] - P[j])/R[i][j])Another approach is to use SIMPLE-like algorithm used in 3D CFD simulation programs. The "true" pressure and flow rates are defined as \(P = P^{*} + P^{\prime }\) and \(Q = Q^{*} + Q^{\prime }\). By linearizing the momentum equation, the flow correction \(Q_{ij}^{\prime }\) is related to the pressure correction \(P^{\prime }\) by: \(Q_{ij}^{\prime }\approx d_{ij}(P_{i}^{\prime } - P_{j}^{\prime })\) where \(d_{ij}\) is a sensitivity coefficient derived from the derivative of the head loss equation. The quadratic head loss (\(\Delta P = R\cdot Q^{2}\)) is linearized using the derivative \(d = \frac{1}{2R\cdot Q}\)
Step-1: Guess initial values of pressures at nodes
Step-2: Calculate flow rates Q* through each branch using equation: \(P_i - P_j = \frac {Q_{ij}}{|Q_{ij}|} \cdot \xi_{ij}\frac{\rho}{2} \cdot \frac {Q_{ij}^2}{A^2}\) where Q/|Q| is a sign change term that insures that the pressure loss term always opposes the flow direction. For constant density and denoting P ≡ P/ρ, Q* ≡ QNEW = ΔP /(QOLD + ε) / R where R ≡ ξ/2A2 and Qij is the flow from node '1' to node 'j' with appropriate sign.Step-3: Calculate flow rate correction Q' by differentiating branch pressure drop equation with respect to Q* and thus \(P'_i - P'_j = \frac {Q_{ij}}{|Q_{ij}|} \cdot \xi_{ij}\rho \cdot \frac {Q_{ij}^*}{A^2}\)
\[\frac{dP_i}{dQ_{ij}} - \frac{dP_j}{dQ_{ij}} = 2 \cdot R_{ij} \cdot Q^*_{ij} \] or \[\frac{P'_i}{Q'_{ij}} - \frac{P'_j}{Q'_{ij}} = 2 \cdot R_{ij} \cdot Q^*_{ij} \] or \[\frac{P'_i}{\beta} - \frac{P'_j}{\beta} = Q'_{ij}\] where \[ \beta = 2 \cdot R_{ij} \cdot Q^*_{ij} \]Step-4: Apply continuity equation at each node, excluding those at boundaries and known pressures to generate system of equation of the form [A]{P'} = {b}. Substitute \(Q_{ij} = Q_{ij}^{*} + Q_{ij}^{\prime }\) into the continuity equation at each node to obtain a system of linear equations for \(P^{\prime }\): \(\sum \limits_{j}d_{ij}(P_{i}^{\prime } - P_{j}^{\prime }) = S_{i} - \sum \limits_{j}Q_{ij}^{*}\). The right-hand side represents the mass imbalance (residual) at node 'i' and 1/β ≡ dij
Step-5: Solve for nodal values of P' and update nodal pressures, P = P* + P' and then compute element flow rate corrections and update branch flow rates: Qij = Q*ij + Q'ij
Step-6: Check for convergence of P and Q
Step-8: Go to step-2 if convergence not achieved.
Newton-Raphson Method for One Non-Linear Equation
xi+1 = xi - f(x) / &partial;f/&partial;x The Newton-Raphson method in matrix form to solve systems of non-linear equations, F(X) = 0, iteratively using the formula \(X_{n+1}=X_{n}-[J(X_{n})]^{-1}F(X_{n})\), where {X} is the vector of unknowns / variables, {F(X)} is the vector of functions, and [J(X)] is the Jacobian matrix containing all partial derivatives. At each iteration, it finds the change \(\Delta X=-[J(X_{n})]^{-1}F(X_{n})\) by solving a linear system, then updates the guess \(X_{n+1} = X_{n}+\Delta X\), repeating until convergence. Key Components System of Equations: \[F(X) = \left[\begin{matrix}f_{1}(x_{1},\dots , x_{n})\\ \vdots \\ f_{n}(x_{1},\dots ,x_{n})\end{matrix}\right]=\left[\begin{matrix}0\\ \vdots \\ 0\end{matrix}\right]\] Variables Vector: \[X = \left[\begin{matrix}x_{1}\\ \vdots \\ x_{n}\end{matrix}\right]\] Jacobian Matrix: \[J(X) = \left[\begin{matrix}\frac{\partial f_{1}}{\partial x_{1}}&\dots &\frac{\partial f_{1}}{\partial x_{n}}\\ \vdots &\ddots &\vdots \\ \frac{\partial f_{n}}{\partial x_{1}}&\dots &\frac{\partial f_{n}}{\partial x_{n}}\end{matrix}\right]\] Iteration Formula: \[X_{n+1} = X_{n}-[J(X_{n})]^{-1}F(X_{n})\] or \[X_{n+1} = X_{n} + \Delta X\text{, where }\Delta X = -[J(X_{n})]^{-1}F(X_{n})\]For more explanations, refer to page engcourses-uofa.ca/books/numericalanalysis/nonlinear-systems-of-equations/newton-raphson-method
Example Validation Cases
All resistances of equal diameters, density of working fluid = 1.25 [kg/m2 constant for all nodes. Resistances are in units of \(\frac{\Delta{P}}{\rho \cdot Q^2} = \frac{kg}{m.s^2}\cdot \frac{m^3}{kg} \cdot \frac{s^2}{m^6} = \frac{1}{m^4} \)Validation Case-1
[0]-------[1]-------[2]-------[3] R_ID s_node e_node RHYD R1 0 1 3 R2 1 2 5 R3 2 3 8Specified pressure [Pa] nodes:
Node Pressure 0 100 3 0Flow through each branch = (100 / 16)0.5 = 2.5 [m3/s] and pressure drops are [18.75, 31.25, 50.0] Pa for each branch and hence node pressures are [100, 81.25, 50.0, 0.0] Pa.
Validation Case-2
[0]-------[1]-------[2]-------[3]
|
|
[4]
R_ID s_node e_node RHYD
R1 0 1 3
R2 1 2 5
R3 2 3 8
R3 2 4 2
Specified pressure [Pa] nodes:
Node Pressure 0 100 3 0 4 0For hydraulic resistance in parallel: \[\sqrt\frac{1}{R^{ij}_{EQ}} = \sqrt\frac{1}{R_i} + \sqrt\frac{1}{R_j} \] Nodes 3 and 4 are in parallel with respect to node 2. Overall resistance of the system = 3 + 5 + 0.889 = 8.889 and thus incoming flow at node 1 is (100 / 8.889)0.5 = 3.354 [m3/s] and pressure drops through series branches are [33.75, 56.25] Pa. The node 1 is at 100 - 33.75 = 66.25 [Pa] and node 2 is at 100 - [33.75 + 56.25] = 10.0 [Pa] and flow through branches 2-3 and 2-4 are [1.118, 2.236] [m3/s].
Step-1:
Initial value of p at nodes: [100, 0, 0, 0]Step-2:
Incidence Matrix: B[s_node, i] = +1 and B[e_node, i] = -1 for i = 0 to NP-1 ---as per assumption that flow along the left node to right node used to define branches (hydraulic resistances) is positive and flow in opposite direction is negative. If a node appears only as start node, it is assumed to have positive flow (flow shall enter into that node) and if a node appears only as end node, the flow is assumed to be negative (flow shall exit through that node).[[+1 0 0] [-1 +1 0] [ 0 -1 +1] [ 0 0 -1]]Each row of the incidence matrix defines the status of that node and node number of connected branches.
Step-3:
Initial flow rates through each branch: Q* = [5.770, 0.001, 0.001] using formula Q=[ΔP/R]1/2 or Q * Q = [ΔP/R] and hence Q = [ΔP/R/Q] then calculate mass imbalance for each node, {b} = [5.770 -5.770, 0.0, 0.0]Step-4:
Calculate pressure correction equation (coefficient matrix)
0.5 / (R[0][1] * Q[0][1]) * (P0' - P1') = Q*01
0.5 / (R[1][2] * Q[1][2]) * (P1' - P2') = Q*12
0.5 / (R[2][3] * Q[2][3]) * (P2' - P3') = Q*23
or
1/β01|+1 -1 0 0| |P0'| |b0|
1/β12| 0 +1 -1 0| |P1'| = |b1|
1/β23| 0 0 +1 -1| |P2'| |b2|
|P3'|
{βij} = (0.0289 = 0.5/5.770/3 100.0 = 0.5/0.001/5 62.5 = 0.5/0.001/8)
[A] =
[[ 1 0 0 0 ] [ 0 100.03 -100.0 0 ] [ 0 -100.00 162.5 0 ] [ 0. 0 0 1 ]]
Step-5:
Solver p_corr = np.linalg.solve(A, b) which gives p_corr = [ 0 -0.150 -0.092 0] - note that pressure correction is negative and it will make intermediate pressure values at nodes beyond the lower and upper limits of boundary conditions. This is an example where {b} and [A] are calculated incorrectly. The iterations using Python code indeed diverged. One likely reason might be that the rows and columns corresponding for specified node pressure are part of coefficient matrix. Second, p_corr = np.linalg.solve(A, -b) should be used instead of p_corr = np.linalg.solve(A, b). In this case, p_corr = np.linalg.solve(A, -b) worked with same coefficient matrix [A] defined above.Both the node pressures and flow rates though branches match the hand calculations for the "Validation Case-1". You may test the following code for your application and let me know cases where it fails.
import numpy as np
def tupleToList(list_of_tuples):
'''
Return the length of unique items in a tuple defining branches
'''
list_1, list_2 = [], []
for t in list_of_tuples:
list_1.append(t[0])
list_2.append(t[1])
unique_list = list(set(list(set(list_1)) + list(set(list_2))))
unique_list.sort()
return len(unique_list), list_1, list_2
def pipeNetwork(pipes, pr_bc, alpha_p=0.5, alpha_q=0.7, max_iter=500, tol=1e-5):
"""
SIMPLE algorithm for arbitrary pipe networks with non-linear resistances
and multiple pressure boundary conditions. Parameters are:
pipes: list of (m, n, R) - Pipe from m -> n with resistance R
pr_bc: dictionary - {node_index: pressure_value}
"""
eps = 1e-8
Np = len(pipes)
nn_nodes, ni, nj = tupleToList(pipes)
nn_uknown = nn_nodes - len(pr_bc.items())
# Incidence matrix
B = np.zeros((nn_nodes, Np)) # N_nodes x N_branch = rows x cols
R = np.zeros(Np)
# Initial guess for pressures at nodes
p = np.ones(nn_nodes)
for node, val in pr_bc.items():
p[node] = val
Q = np.ones(Np) * 0.001 # small non-zero initial flow
for i, (m, n, Ri) in enumerate(pipes):
B[m, i] = +1.0
B[n, i] = -1.0
R[i] = Ri
if p[m] - p[n] != 0:
Q[i] = np.sign(p[m] - p[n]) * np.sqrt(abs(p[m] - p[n]) / R[i])
# Start SIMPLE-type iterations
for it in range(max_iter):
# 1. Update effective resistance (non-linearity)
R_eff = R * np.abs(Q) + eps
# 2. Momentum predictor
dp = B.T @ p
Q_star = dp / R_eff # Q * Q = dp/R, Q = dp / [R * Q] = dp/R_eff
# 3. Mass imbalance
b = B @ Q_star
# 4. Pressure correction system: dp/dq = 2RQ = 0.5/R_eff
d = 0.5 / R_eff
Ap = B @ np.diag(d) @ B.T
# Apply pressure boundary conditions
for node, val in pr_bc.items():
Ap[node, :] = 0.0
Ap[:, node] = 0.0
Ap[node, node] = 1.0
b[node] = 0.0
# 5. Solve pressure correction: "source term" is the mass imbalance
p_corr = np.linalg.solve(Ap, -b)
# 6. Update pressures
p = p + alpha_p * p_corr
for node, val in pr_bc.items():
p[node] = val
# 7. Correct flows
for i, (m, n, Ri) in enumerate(pipes):
if p[m] - p[n] != 0:
Q[i] = np.sign(p[m] - p[n]) * np.sqrt(abs(p[m] - p[n]) / R[i])
# 8. Check convergence: return node connectivity, node pressure, flow rates
if np.max(np.abs(b)) < tol:
print(f"Converged in {it+1} iterations")
return ni, nj, p, Q
# Print divergence and return 'None'
print("SIMPLE did not converge!")
return ni, nj, None, None
pipes = [(0, 1, 3.0), (1, 2, 5.0), (2, 3, 8.0), (2, 4, 2.0)]
pr_bc = {0: 100.0, 3: 0.0, 4: 0.0}
ni, nj, nodeP, Qdot = pipeNetwork(pipes=pipes, pr_bc=pr_bc, max_iter=100)
if nodeP is not None:
print("-" * 50)
print("All values are in chosen unit of pressure and [m^3/s]")
print("Node pressures:")
for index, value in enumerate(nodeP, start=1):
print(f"{index}: {value:8.2f}")
if Qdot is not None:
print("-" * 50)
print("Flow through pipe branches:")
for index, value in enumerate(Qdot):
print(f" {ni[index]} -> {nj[index]} = {value:6.3f} |", end="")
print("\n")
This code does not provide option to specify fixed flow rate through a branch. The code solves incompressible flow (constant density) and pressure is in reality specific energy [J/kg] - where hydraulic resistance is defined ΔP/ρ = R.Q2.
Hardy-Cross Method Example:
A single closed loop with three pipes (Pipe 1, Pipe 2, Pipe 3) and known flow in a main supply line. The head loss (\(h_{f}\)) can be calculated using the Darcy-Weisbach equation in its discharge form: \(h_{f}=R\cdot Q^{2}\), where \(R=\frac{8fL}{\pi ^{2}gD^{5}}\) is the pipe resistance coefficient. 'R' values are known and constant. A clockwise flow is positive, and counter-clockwise is negative.Step 1: Assign Initial Flow Rates (Q) and R values
Pipe Length (L) Diameter (D) Friction Factor (f) Resistance (R) Flow (Q) 1 ... ... ... 0.5 10 2 ... ... ... 0.8 6 3 ... ... ... 1.2 4Note: Ensure the initial flow guess satisfies continuity at junctions.
Step 2: Calculate the Head Loss (\(\mathbf{h}_{\mathbf{f}}\)) for each pipe The head loss is \(h_{f}=R\cdot Q|Q|\) to maintain the correct sign for head loss regardless of flow direction. Pipe 1: \(h_{f1}=R_{1}\cdot Q_{1}|Q_{1}|=0.5\cdot 10\cdot 10=+50\), Pipe 2: \(h_{f2}=R_{2}\cdot Q_{2}|Q_{2}|=0.8\cdot 6\cdot 6=+28.8\), Pipe 3: \(h_{f3}=R_{3}\cdot Q_{3}|Q_{3}|=1.2\cdot (-4)\cdot |-4|=-19.2\) (Negative because flow is counter-clockwise)
Step 3: Check the Head Loss Summation around the loop According to energy conservation, the sum of head losses around a closed loop should be zero (\(\sum h_{f}=0\)). \(\sum h_{f}=h_{f1}+h_{f2}+h_{f3}=50+28.8+(-19.2)=59.6\) The result is not zero, so the initial flow rates are incorrect.
Step 4: Calculate the Flow Correction ΔQ. The Hardy-Cross method uses the following formula to find the flow correction needed for the loop: \(\Delta Q=-\frac{\sum h_{f}}{n\sum (\frac{h_{f}}{Q})}\) where n is typically 2. Calculate \(\sum (\frac{h_{f}}{Q})\) (absolute values can be used here as the sign is handled in the \(h_{f}\) summation). Pipe 1: \(\frac{h_{f1}}{Q_{1}}=\frac{50}{10}=5\), Pipe 2: \(\frac{h_{f2}}{Q_{2}}=\frac{28.8}{6}=4.8\), Pipe 3: \(\frac{h_{f3}}{Q_{3}}=\frac{-19.2}{-4}=4.8\), \(\sum (\frac{h_{f}}{Q})=5+4.8+4.8=14.6\) Now, calculate \(\Delta Q\): \(\Delta Q = -\frac{59.6}{2\cdot 14.6} = -\frac{59.6}{29.2}\approx -2.04\)Step 5: Update the Flow Rates Apply the flow correction to each pipe in the loop. The sign of \(\Delta Q\) is negative, meaning the flows in the clockwise direction were overestimated and need to be reduced, or the counter-clockwise flow needs to be increased. Pipe 1 (Clockwise): \(Q_{1,new}=Q_{1}+\Delta Q=10+(-2.04)=7.96\), Pipe 2 (Clockwise): \(Q_{2,new} = Q_{2}+\Delta Q = 6+(-2.04)=3.96\), Pipe 3 (Counter-clockwise, so subtract \(\Delta Q\)): \(Q_{3,new}=Q_{3}-\Delta Q=-4-(-2.04)=-1.96\)
Step 6: Repeat Repeat the process (Steps 2-5) with the new flow rates until the ΔQ value is negligible (close to zero), indicating that \(\sum h_{f}\) is close to zero and the solution has converged. The process is iterative and can be automated using spreadsheets or scripting such as Python programming.Example: 3-Reservoirs System, here \(R=\frac{8fL}{\pi^{2}gD^{5}}\)
Goal is to find the flow in each of the three pipes and the pressure at the junction '4' and pressure is expressed as height of water column.
| |
| [1] | | |
|_______| | [3] |
\ /``````|_______|
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ / | |
\ / | [2] |
[4]*---------------|_______|
\
\
===========---=====================Ground==========
H = (70 80 100 ?) [m], friction factor = 0.015
L[1, 4] = 5000 [m], L[2, 4] = 3000 [m], L[3, 4] = 4000 [m]
D[1, 4] = 0.60 [m], D[2, 4] = 0.80 [m], D[3, 4] = 1.20 [m]
R[1, 4] = 72.7266, R[2, 4] = 11.3517 , R[3, 4] = 1.99316
Pipe [1, 4]: H[1] - H[4] = R[1, 4] * Q[1, 4] * |Q[1, 4]|
Pipe [2, 4]: H[2] - H[4] = R[2, 4] * Q[2, 4] * |Q[2, 4]|
Pipe [3, 4]: H[3] - H[4] = R[3, 4] * Q[3, 4] * |Q[3, 4]|
Pipe [1, 4]: 70 = H[4] + 72.7266 * Q[1, 4] * |Q[1, 4]|
Pipe [2, 4]: 80 = H[4] + 1.99316 * Q[2, 4] * |Q[2, 4]|
Pipe [3, 4]: 100 = H[4] + 11.3517 * Q[3, 4] * |Q[3, 4]|
From continuity (mass conservation) at node-4: Q[1, 4] + Q[2, 4] + Q[3, 4] = 0. Re-arranging the 4 equations:
H[4] R[1, 4]*Q[1, 4]*|Q[1, 4]| 0 0 = 70 H[4] 0 R[2, 4]*Q[2, 4]*|Q[2, 4]| 0 = 100 H[4] 0 0 R[3, 4]*Q[3, 4]*|Q[3, 4]| = 80 0 Q[1, 4] Q[2, 4] Q[3, 4] = 0The system is non-linear and needs an iterative solution method. The conventional vector-matrix format is:
[1 R[1, 4]*|Q[1, 4]| 0 ] {H[4] } {H[1]} {e1}
[1 0 R[2, 4]*|Q[2, 4]| ] {Q[1, 4]} _ {H[2]} = {e2}
[1 0 0 R[3, 4]*|Q[3, 4]|] {Q[2, 4]} {H[3]} {e3}
[0 1 1 1] {Q[3, 4]} { 0] {e4}
Right-hand side of the system of equations is a vector of continuity (mass imbalances). One method to solve them is to square these values eTe (T = transpose), then minimize this sum of squared errors by changing unknowns "H[4], Q[1, 4], Q[2, 4], Q[3, 4]" to get the solution.
Results are: Q[1, 4] = -0.395 [m3/s] i.e. 0.395 [m3/s] from node 4 to reservoir 1 (opposite the original assumed direction), Q[2, 4] = +1.273 [m3/s] from reservoir 2 to the node 4 (along the assumed flow direction in the pipe), Q[3, 4] = -0.890 [m3/s] i.e. 0.890 [m3/s] from the node 4 to reservoir 3 (opposite the original assumed direction) and h[4] = 81.60 [m] with mass imbalance of -0.012 [m3/s] at node '4'.
The input for the pipeNetwork() program described above would be as mentioned below. Note that the pressure of reservoirs should be as per equation P = ρgh. However, for demonstration purpose, the pressure was specified as P/ρ/g which is "pressure head" and hence output pressure for node '0' is also in this unit only.pipes = [(0, 1, 72.7266), (0, 2, 11.3517), (0, 3, 1.99316)]
pr_bc = {1: 70.0, 2: 100.0, 3: 80.0}
And output from the program is:
Converged in 18 iterations -------------------------------------------------- All values are in chosen unit of pressure and [m^3/s] Node pressures: 1: 81.53 2: 70.00 3: 100.00 4: 80.00 -------------------------------------------------- Flow through pipe branches: 0 -> 1 = 0.398 | 0 -> 2 = -1.275 | 0 -> 3 = 0.877 |
References:
The content on CFDyna.com is being constantly refined and improvised with on-the-job experience, testing, and training. Examples might be simplified to improve insight into the physics and basic understanding. Linked pages, articles, references, and examples are constantly reviewed to reduce errors, but we cannot warrant full correctness of all content.
Template by OS Templates